As the final season of HBO’s Game of Thrones came to an end, viewers were left with more questions than answers about the ultimate fate of Westeros and its inhabitants.
In this article, we will delve into the various theories surrounding the real end of Game of Thrones, analyzing the evidence and expert opinions to determine which theory is most plausible. We will also examine how game developers can use this information to create compelling stories and worlds that resonate with their audiences.
The Multiple Endings Theory: A Closer Look
One of the most popular theories surrounding the end of Game of Thrones is the multiple endings theory, which posits that there were multiple possible outcomes for the story. This theory suggests that the final season was designed to leave viewers with the option to interpret the ending in their own way.
Supporters of this theory argue that the showrunners, David Benioff and D.B. Weiss, intentionally left room for interpretation, allowing viewers to choose which ending they preferred. They point to the fact that many scenes were shot in multiple ways, with different versions filmed to create a sense of ambiguity and uncertainty.
However, critics of this theory argue that it was not entirely intentional and that there was no clear intention to leave the ending open to interpretation. They also suggest that there were several key moments throughout the final season that pointed towards a specific outcome.
The Deadpool Theory: A Popular Choice Among Game Developers
Another popular theory among game developers is the Deadpool theory, which suggests that the true ending of the series was actually revealed in an alternate timeline or parallel universe. This theory posits that Westeros was destroyed by a massive dragon attack, leaving only a few survivors to rebuild society from scratch.
Supporters of this theory argue that there were several clues throughout the final season that pointed towards this outcome, such as the fact that Daenerys Targaryen was killed by her own dragons and that Jon Snow was left in charge of the Seven Kingdoms. They also suggest that the showrunners intentionally left room for fans to interpret the ending in their own way, allowing them to choose which version of events they preferred.
However, critics of this theory argue that it is not entirely plausible and that there were several key moments throughout the final season that contradicted this outcome. They also suggest that the showrunners did not intentionally leave the ending open to interpretation, but rather chose a specific outcome based on their creative vision.
The True Ending: A Verdict from Experts
So, which theory is most plausible? According to several experts in the field of storytelling and narrative analysis, it is difficult to say for certain. However, they suggest that there are several key factors that should be considered when analyzing the ending of Game of Thrones.
Firstly, it is important to consider the character arcs of the major players in the story. While many fans may have been disappointed with the way that certain characters were developed or killed off, experts suggest that the showrunners had a clear vision for each character’s journey and that they did their best to stay true to that vision.
Secondly, it is important to consider the themes and motifs that ran throughout the series. Game of Thrones was a complex and intricate story that explored issues such as power, loyalty, and the struggle for survival in a harsh and unforgiving world.
